The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CampusIT[edit]

CampusIT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a company that does not meet WP:CORP guidelines for notability for companies. The article started as a copy of material from the company's web site. Almost all references in the article are primary sources from the company web site. The two exceptions (at time of nomination) are a listing in a business directory and a listing as an exhibitor at a trade show; neither of which establish notability. A search of Google News shows [1] that there area couple of articles behind pay walls that appear to be related to their implementation at the University of Glamorgan. But even if we assume that the coverage in these articles are not just mere mentions, this represents very sparse coverage for a company. Whpq (talk) 14:28, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Yet another of the endless series of minor tech businesses: student management solutions to education institutions in the UK and Ireland. No inkling of technical or historic significance. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 22:12, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete only an advertisment User:Lucifero4
• Delete only references are to its own website, or yellow-pages like mentiones. Nothing except for fleeting mentions of it in secondary sources, from what I've seen from a brief look on google. Tim1357 (talk) 17:34, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Reads like an ad, no credible coverage LoudHowie (talk) 22:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.