The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as a copyright violation. Article was cut-and-pasted from Beerware with only a few of the words changed. Also WP:SNOW. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CandyWare[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neologism - no proof given that this term has actually been used with this meaning. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 08:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--Rmartin271 (talk) 16:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)If all the users had the right to delete articles than Wikipedia would be empty. It might not seem important to you, but can be important to others. In this case Martin Bestawros is trying to prove that he has his own license. When people buy his products from iTUNES or from the web how are they to believe that this license is real. They will search it in google and guess what the first result will be: it will be the wikipedia candware post. Hope you are now more educated about the topic and will reconsider and not just go around deleting pages on wikipedia.[reply]

Delete as a neologism. Wikipedia describes what is notable; it doesn't prescribe it. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 17:40, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOTADVERTISING --Northernhenge (talk) 20:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't find any reliable sources here. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as prodder. Concepts must catch on before Wikipedia mentions them, not the other way around. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 23:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 03:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete WP:NEO that quickly becomes a WP:PROMO for a specific individual (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:09, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.