![]() |
The result was speedy deleted per WP:G12 by Amatulic (talk · contribs). Begonia brandbygeana (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
While the subject might be notable this article appears to mostly be an advertisement for the management company with a big dose of COI as well. Eeekster (talk) 23:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tone 19:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found no significant coverage for this product. The only source in the article is the official website. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 23:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No indications of notability. This article appears to be based entirely on a memoir written by the subject's son and self-published on webs.com. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Long-established practice is that major geographic features are notable. Sandstein 06:55, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One-sentence stub, no reliable sources about 10 pages into Google, seems non-notable. Pilif12p 22:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Besides the river is part of the officially codified river network of Romania. The article indicates this official code which is used by authorities to identify the river. This in itself should justify the notability which been assessed by the water authorities of the country. Afil (talk) 05:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tone 19:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bit of an odd one this, I can't really see how it's encyclopedic. The two subjects are clearly notable, but a comparison? My deletion rationale is based around WP:NOTCASE or WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Pol430 talk to me 22:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus is that the incident is not notable enough to warrant coverage in an article. Sandstein 07:07, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
non notable incident. Doesn't meet WP:aircrash William 22:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn, consensus to keep reached (no more delete arguments) Tone 22:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
the subject is non notable, unverifiable (no sources at all) and has no prospect for expansion. U5K0'sTalkMake WikiLove not WikiWar 21:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To watch the 9 minute video on YouTube, visit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMsA6_Qh_jw — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.83.124.130 (talk) 23:33, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is also a non notable scooby-doo episode. I couldn't find any reliable source. mabdul 21:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tone 19:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't look like much information is added to the article. It has no importance in my opinion. Creation7689 (talk) 21:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable and no notability asserted. This may partly because the refinery doesn't actually exist yet as both the only two references make clear. Speculative and crystal ball gazing. Velella Velella Talk 20:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to School District 44 North Vancouver. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
School through grade 7. Convention with such schools is (I understand) to delete and/or redirect. Appears to be non-notable. Zero refs here, and thus zero RS-supported text to consider merging. Delete (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine) appears to be in order. Tagged for lack of refs for over 2 years. Epeefleche (talk) 19:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tone 19:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
article based on an assumption that a yet to be built arena (Allentown Arena) will host a specific team (Adirondack Phantoms). I don't believe there's been any acknowledgement, let alone statement, from the American Hockey League regarding any relocation yet. TerminalPreppie (talk) 19:18, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject is not notable enough for an article. The "keep" opinions do not address the analysis of the quality of the sources, instead going on at length about tangential issues such as other articles or user conduct. Sandstein 08:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This analysis is essentially a summary of NLinpublic (talk · contribs)'s discussion here. Using this version of the page, there are seven sources. None indicate notability per either WP:N or WP:PROF. That is, none discuss the subject of the page in detail; instead, most are citations of the individual's work indicating he has written articles for newspapers and the like. Below are the seven sources used:
There is no demonstration of notability in that there is no discussion of Khan, his actions or his publications. An academic (or in this case an analyst) being cited does not establish notability. Since NLinpublic's analysis, additional pieces written by Khan have been added [12] but none are about him. There seems to be a misunderstanding regarding notability - merely having published pieces is not sufficient to pass notability; the page's subject must be demonstrated independently notable through discussion by others. Since the page's subject is from Pakistan, we could use Urdu sources per WP:NOENG if they can be located but to date none have been integrated into the page (and would require careful vetting due to translation issues, natch). WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 19:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Second,in google search,if you a well known person with wrong spelling clicking,in google search automatically appear,"Do you mean that"? and then with wrong and right spelling both names information displays. For the surety, I searched again the names mentioned in your comment,but find nothing except actors,dancers and singers etc. Justice007 (talk) 11:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment on sock/meat puppetry accusations - JCBills, the accusations of sockpuppetry by Justice007 (and daughters) need to either be backed up by filing a case at WP:SPI or retracted. As for accusing Nolelover/NLinpublic of socking, well as those are acknowledged alternate accounts, that's just ridiculous and should be struck. LadyofShalott 23:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. Tone 19:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully professional league. Ytfc23 (talk) 19:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
DO NOT DELETE - this footballer came into the English Professional Leagues via Ghana and then Cyprus which has attracted media attention (I have added a couple of citations and could add more if required), plus he has been on the bench in many League games at Northampton and in FA cup matches at Yeovil and so is on the cusp of his first professional league appearance, plus he has represented both Northampton Town and Yeovil Town in many reserve matches and, in the case of Yeovil, in the Somreset Cup as well. Furthermore, the Academy he founded is sending young African players to Europe as well as making an important contribution to a poor community in Accra and running a semi-professional Ghanaian league team - see www.ghana-football-academy.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geogpmsp (talk • contribs) 17:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Doha#Education. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
School through grade 9. Convention with such schools is (I understand) to delete and/or redirect. Appears to be non-notable. Zero refs here, and thus zero RS-supported text to consider merging. Delete (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine) appears to be in order. Tagged for lack of refs and notability since June. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 18:15, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE for closer: if this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the ((R from school)) on the redirect page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Sandstein 06:52, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
This article is pure WP:OR and is being used as a WP:COATRACK. The article says "Indians in Afghanistan currently consist of those working in various construction projects, as part of India's rebuilding efforts in Afghanistan" but is actually about Indian intelligence apparently arming Baloch rebels and attacking Pakistan. Which also makes it a WP:FORK of the Balochistan conflict Darkness Shines (talk) 18:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep A very sound article which definately has a place on wikipedia taking note of possible terrorist activities by some organizations does not mean it is pov darkness shines must stop being offended with information he may not agree with 109.150.57.127 (talk) 19:52, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note the above user is a tad bit paranoid who believes you need a phd or something in that order to edit wikipedia ignore I suggest Suppositries (talk) 21:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: A lot of the edits on the page by Pakistani editors seem to be in bad faith and a poor attempt to publish propaganda on Wikipedia. Why waste your time on this? Isn't there anything better for you to do with your time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.71.39.10 (talk) 20:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to BlackBerry Curve. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article shows no reason for notability, or why it deserves its own article, I believe it should be merged into BlackBerry Curve. Gsingh (talk) 17:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tone 19:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This institute does not exist, and per WP:CRYSTAL so shouldn't the article. The cited undated articles are in fact from 2009: here and here are articles with dates, discussing the statement by Veerappa Moily, and verifying the date in which it occurred. Since then, the institute is still merely a proposal. here is a year old report that says again that "Mr. Moily had recently stated that there is a proposal to establish an IIT at Muddenahalli" (my emphasis). I can find no evidence that this was approved, nor that 200 acres were set for it - the news reports discuss 200 acres set for VIAT. Muhandes (talk) 17:26, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom - institution doesnt exist so neither should the article. Fmph (talk) 19:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:20, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Zero refs. Zero gnews hits. Zero gbooks hits. Tagged for notability since September, for lack of refs since 2007, and as an orphan for nearly 3 years. Created by a one-edit-only-ever SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 17:26, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:20, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bio with zero refs. Zero gnews hits. Zero gbooks hits. Appears non-notable and OR. Created by an SPA. Tagged for lack of refs for well over 4 years. Epeefleche (talk) 17:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tone 19:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ESSAY ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 16:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g3, blatant hoax, author created other hoax articles as well. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable television program. No indications that it actually exists, based on Google searches. Based on the awards it has won, some internet evidence should exist. Possible hoax. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:06, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This artist is largely unknown in her own country - or anywhere else, as far as I know. Her father is fairly notable, but she is definitely not. Take not that her (possibly self-promoting) article at the french wikipedia has been deleted four years ago for failing to meet the notability criteria. Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 16:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tone 19:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable mixed martial arts event. Only a handful of notable fighters. Promoted by a non-notable promotion. Having aired as a PPV does not make the event inherently significant in any way. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 15:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:51, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article is completely unsourced and I can't find any reliable sources. Also has been tagged as not notable. Kgeee65 (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g3, blatant hoax. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:48, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this article may well be a complete hoax. Searches for this title generate no relevant results. Certainly a program that has been on the air for 17 years and received so many awards should have generated SOME internet footprint. At least one claimed award (2010 Indian Television Academy Award for Best Male Actor in a Negative Role) can be verified to be false. (Article claims it went to Ejaz Kapoor but the awards' own website credits Meghna Malik with that award.) WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete per G11 (unambiguous advertising) by Jimfbleak (talk · contribs)
Non-notable band. Claims of notability cannot be verified. Google search on name "Uros Planinc" returns only sites controlled by the band itself (myspace, facebook, youtube, etc). No independent sources to be found. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 06:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article is pure speculation about a rumoured operating system. You will have to look through the edit history to see what content used to be there as it was blanked. See WP:CRYSTAL for more info. Millermk90 (talk) 05:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's based on sources, and I don't think "collection of product announcements and rumors" means that we must always delete - of course we don't want to list every single announcement, but this is regarding the number one smartphone and mobile device company. We seem to have articles before official announcement on everything regarding Apple, after all (see [15] still active). If people disagree, then might I also suggested merging with Series 40? The information itself is still useful, and shouldn't be deleted, even if the topic is deemed not to deserve its own article yet. Mdwh (talk) 00:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's not about Series 40. So far analysts suggest that Meltemi would replace Symbian/S60 as the entry-level OS, i.e. the EPOC32 core will be replaced by the Linux core and the S60 UI from latest Symbian releases will be merged with MeeGo 'smartphone' UI. That's potentially dozens of end-user devices and dozen million sales - I don't see how it is unnotable when we have huge articles on Maemo and MeeGo which had very few end-user phones released and sold only several dozen thousands. Let it hang for now - if Meltemi doesn't really get any traction within a year or two, then delete it, right now it's quite promising to delete it right away. --Dmitry (talk•contibs) 10:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tone 20:00, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article about footballer who according to svenskfotboll.se (SvFF's official website) has never played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline. Earlier proposed deletion was contested with no explanation. Jogurney (talk) 13:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:50, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
BLP sourced only to IMDB. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. Unknown label (their front page is selling his latest album...). All links are promotional. No actual references in article. Can't find any that pass wp:rs when searching. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:16, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Lee style tai chi chuan. (The proposed redirect target is a redirect there.) (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:49, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No notability justified, and the article is more a list of dot points. If the name is worth keeping then maybe convert it to a redirect to Li style T'ai Chi Ch'uan — billinghurst sDrewth 11:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. CSD A10 would normally apply, except that there is a valid target to redirect to. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
per WP:CBALL, film/series not released. mabdul 10:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7. SmartSE (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Paucity of substantial rs coverage suggests lack of notability. Tagged for zero refs for over a year. Epeefleche (talk) 08:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as a copyright violation. Article was cut-and-pasted from Beerware with only a few of the words changed. Also WP:SNOW. The Bushranger One ping only 23:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism - no proof given that this term has actually been used with this meaning. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 08:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
--Rmartin271 (talk) 16:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)If all the users had the right to delete articles than Wikipedia would be empty. It might not seem important to you, but can be important to others. In this case Martin Bestawros is trying to prove that he has his own license. When people buy his products from iTUNES or from the web how are they to believe that this license is real. They will search it in google and guess what the first result will be: it will be the wikipedia candware post. Hope you are now more educated about the topic and will reconsider and not just go around deleting pages on wikipedia.[reply]
The result was Speedy delete(G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). JamesBWatson (talk) 08:15, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Autobiography of a Wikipedian contributor. Abhijay ☎(Тalk)/✍ (My Deeds) 07:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tone 20:00, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Movie lacks refs, gnews hits, and gbooks hits. Appears to lack substantial independent rs coverage. Tagged for notability and lack of refs since September. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 07:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tone 20:00, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This event lacks substantial RS coverage. Zero refs. Tagged for notability since June. Epeefleche (talk) 07:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete all. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
These players all fail WP:RLN as they have not played in a first grade or international match. In addition many have copyvio concerns as they look like they have been copy/paste from the official website. Mattlore (talk) 06:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages due to the above concerns:[reply]
The result was delete all. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:23, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Should be deleted per tennis project ladies tournament guidelines. From 2008–2012 the ITF Women's $35,000–$100,000+ tournaments are the only ones considered notable. These do not meet notability in tennis project guidelines of a $35,000 tournament. Other pages of this low-level type tournament have already been deleted. see - other articles deleted Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:35, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Capistrano Unified School District. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This school only teaches grades 6-8 and thus does not enjoy the assumption of notability accorded high schools in AFDs in recent years. Does not appear to satisfy WP:ORG, the relevant notability guideline, despite some run of the mill coverage in the LA Times, in its role as the local newspaper. Edison (talk) 05:15, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE for closer: if this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the ((R from school)) on the redirect page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tone 20:00, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Has never played in a fully pro league and never played while at Celtic. Has only played in the Conference & therefore fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 04:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:GNG, can't find any significant third-party sources indicating notability. Contested prod with reasons of unlikely notability as well Falcon8765 (TALK) 21:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
unreferenced original research. Reads like an essay on the subject. Possibly notable subject but not in this form. Can be adequately covered in existing Address Verification System article. RadioFan (talk) 21:40, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep as it is confusing in its current form. One, the first sentance of the article should explain the subject, e.g. 'Postal Addess Verification' is.. then describe how it differs from 'Address Verification System'. Two, Wikipedia cannot be used as source material as per WP:CIRCULAR. To learn how to cross reference to other Wikipedia articles see Help:Wikilinks. Mariepr (talk) 17:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Author may want to consider working with somebody who has no knowledge of these address verification systems. In its present form it is very confusing and seems to be written for somebody having advanced technical knowledge of bulk mailing lists. Articles must be understandable to the average reader. Mariepr (talk) 16:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Article content is not covered elsewhere, however is still in need of significant attention.
The result was speedy delete by NawlinWiki (talk · contribs) under WP:CSD#A7, as no explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content). (non-admin closure) Quasihuman | Talk 11:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Possible Autobiography of a Wikipedian user. Abhijay ☎(Тalk)/✍ (My Deeds) 03:23, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Boeing 737 rudder issues. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable incident. Isn't a hull loss. Doesn't meet WP:AIRCRASH criteria. Might be worth noting i 737 article only because of that aircraft's history of rudder deflections. William 21:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdrawn. SL93 (talk) 02:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found zero sources. The band won a rookie award and only released one song according to the article. That was back in 2003. The official website is a dead link. Fails WP:MUSIC. SL93 (talk) 03:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Jujutacular talk 06:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Limited release, lacks notability. Article only consists of track listing and basic release info. —Andrewstalk 21:03, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:37, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced for more than four years, convert to a category. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 02:18, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:17, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
doubt notability Lmatt (talk) 01:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep; clear consensus that the subject meets WP:POLITICIAN. (non-admin closure) Gongshow Talk 09:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to be sufficiently notable. Herp Derp (talk) 01:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep; clear consensus that the subject meets WP:POLITICIAN. (non-admin closure) Gongshow Talk 09:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to be sufficiently notable. Herp Derp (talk) 01:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The existence of this individual is derived from a non-reliable, fantasmagorical 19th-century genealogical 'just-so' story based on nothing more than that the ancestor of the first Counts of Flanders had the role of Forester, so he must have been ancestor of everyone named Forster and even Foster. No modern account of the Counts of Flanders even wastes time refuting such patent nonsense. Agricolae (talk) 06:45, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. After new sources were found. Sandstein 07:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Totally lacking WP:RS to satisfy WP:BANDor WP:GNG … beau coup links to IMDb are meaningless. — The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome (talk) 23:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This was my first article and I stand corrected I had no idea the IMDB links were meaningless, so my apologies and hope to see this article stay. It is a work in progress and this will grow. Thanks, Kurt N. Kurtnardone (talk) 23:07, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of typefaces. I've unlinked the wikilink to Year Supply of Fairy Cakes from the target article. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang Join the DR army! 21:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found no significant coverage for this font. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 21:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
unremarkable viral video subject. limited media attention, lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. contested 2nd'd prod. RadioFan (talk) 23:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy close. The issue requires a merge discussion, not AfD. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, something needs to be done. There are two articles about this topic. This article ("2011-12") is a poorly written version that is mostly the work of one person, with content from the other article pasted in. The other article ("2011") is a little better written and less clunky.
Can we just get on one page here, folks? tedder (talk) 00:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]