The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of typefaces. I've unlinked the wikilink to Year Supply of Fairy Cakes from the target article. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang ^{Join the DR army!} 21:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Year Supply of Fairy Cakes

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage for this font. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 21:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of typefaces. I couldn't find anything to show that this particular type of font is especially notable.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 00:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 00:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to List of typefaces The only possible notability criterion that could be applied to this article, WP:GNG, is failed because none of the web pages mentioning this font even remotely qualify as reliable. Magister Scienta ^talk 01:41, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.