The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mick Softley. (non-admin closure) wumbolo ^^^ 14:08, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Capital (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability and no sources. A quick search does not bring up any WP:RS. Lopifalko (talk) 07:31, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 07:31, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 October 2. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with article on Mick Softley. This article does not say anything other than that this was an album released by Mick Softley in 1976, and the track listing, and I am not sure that this really justifies a standalone article. Vorbee (talk) 08:05, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect to Mick Softley. No significant coverage found. I don't see anything to be merged here. I think any searches for this could be covered by an entry in the Capital disambiguation page, pointing to the Mick Softley article. We could redirect this, although I'm not keen on keeping convoluted disambiguated titles as redirects as they seem unlikely search terms. --Michig (talk) 08:30, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Mick Softley. Standalone article was the only option but coverage is not that significant for it. Accesscrawl (talk) 10:19, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.