The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:18, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carol Yu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I may be missing something because I only read English, but I couldn't establish that she meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Judging by the username of the article creator (a single-purpose account), probably a case of self-promotion. Citobun (talk) 21:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:BIO. The Chinese article was speedily deleted two days ago as G11. Philg88 ^♦talk 06:47, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm also not a Chinese speaker but my searches found nothing good with these links being the best I found. SwisterTwister talk 05:26, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.