The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No notability asserted. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - previously proposed for deletion as "Non-notable non-injury minor damage accident"; that just about sums it up. . . Rcawsey (talk) 09:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete people may be surprised at this, but airplanes make emergency landings all the time. Per WP:AIRCRASH, there is nothing unusual, no deaths, no substantial change in policy, and no lasting significance beyond news stories that day, so there really is no reason to keep it around. Tavix(talk) 17:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete news event with no historical importance. -Atmoz (talk) 18:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This kind of event happens to often for this one to be notable. Not to mention, they haven't retired the flight number so you couldn't use it as the title of the article. SeanMD80talk | contribs 22:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per my original PROD on this article Non-notable non-injury minor damage accident. MilborneOne (talk) 22:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, sufficient to mention this in the article on the airline. Mjroots (talk) 18:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.