The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Casa Rosa

[edit]

Seems to be completely non-notable (or at any rate, does nothing to establish its notability, and seems to be totally run-of-the-mill). It has several misleading links - including one from pink - and is totally unsourced. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 12:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Seems there are some mentions in Google books. [1] Seems to have some notability. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 16:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a historic structure in Old San Juan, Puerto Rico (albeit a minor one). I added some external links to the article, although it was difficult finding reliable sources, due to the rather generic name of the place, which means simply "pink house." •••Life of Riley (T–C) 21:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The sources that have been added to the article (WP:HEY) demonstrate notability. --Oakshade (talk) 02:44, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Based on the NPS travel itinerary, it appears to be a contributing property to San Juan National Historic Site. If it isn't, the fact that the NPS documents it is probably reason enough to demonstrate its notability. Besides, we have an article on John Mellencamp's song Pink Houses, which dates back to 1983. This building dates back to 1812, so it's got 171 years more notability. (OK, I digress.) --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 17:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.