The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Casiotone. Overall consensus is to Redirect so pointless leaving this for another day!, Obvious consensus is obvious. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 00:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Casio CTK 230[edit]

Casio CTK 230 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable on its own. Redirect to Casiotone? BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 16:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 23:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 23:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good point, this is in fact not a Casiotone branded keyboard. --OpenFuture (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.