The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cat communication. Tone 16:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cat body language[edit]

Cat body language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very short, unfocused, essay-like article. Most of this content is redundant to the main cat article, cat behavior and/or cat communication — and if it's not there, it should be there instead. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge back to Cat communication. This is one of their primary ways to communicate (if not the primary way). I'm sure there is not so much to say for the general (cat-loving) public that all information on the topic of cat communication can not be covered in one article. Jaque Hammer (talk) 23:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, merge back, agree.Biophys (talk) 04:42, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge back to Cat communication per Jaque Hammer and Biophys. I can't see what is the difference, so it is unneeded. If the article were feature-length, then a fork may be needed, but that is not the case. P.S. I am owned by a cat myself. Bearian (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge back seems to me to be a reasonable idea. Sterrettc (talk) 00:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.