The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:47, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Catriona Toop

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for Non notable bit part actress. Does not have multiple significant roles in notable productions. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article is bombarded with multiple sources but none are independent reliable sources with any depth of coverage of the actress. (Bird on a Wire is a Rotisserie, not a reliable source [1]). Probable UPE. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:32, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's no substance to any of the sources and there is very little online about the subject. Fails WP:GNG quite badly. Schwede 66 09:21, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly fails WP:NACTOR by the looks of it. Sheldybett (talk) 08:34, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Has not "had significant roles in multiple television shows". One at a big stretch, but not enough. (Dushan Jugum (talk) 09:03, 2 May 2019 (UTC)).[reply]
Delete Per nom. it appears it lacks enough notability 17:32, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Laosilika (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.