The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per WP:V. Lacks significant coverage in sources that are independent of subject. Any notability standard that allows unverifiable articles is flawed. Gigs (talk) 00:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep verified by the team site. There really should be better references, but given the language problems this may be difficult. DGG ( talk ) 02:01, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.