The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship in Family Guy (season 1) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article makes absolutley no sense. The description is misleading, it says "Here, the edits made to season 1 are listed.", but there in fact is only 1/7 of the episode, only the pilot episode. And it's already explained in Death has a Shadow, if that's not the right place, nothing is. My point is this article serves no purpose. TheBlazikenMaster 19:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC) :Withdraw I will give the article a little more time, it's unfair that this article gets removed after only 2 days. TheBlazikenMaster 19:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Are you sure? I came here to say I think it should be deleted. TJ Spyke 20:00, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agreed. This article, and the series of articles which it would spawn, would seem to violate the principle that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, not to mention significant sourcing and notability concerns. Powers ^T 20:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ok, I will revert the edits I made. Only because you guys agree with the deletion. TheBlazikenMaster 20:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • But I still think it was made in a good faith and the speedy deletion is incorrect. TheBlazikenMaster 20:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete If you don't want to nominate it, I will. Regardless of how long this article has been around and whether or not it's finished, I really don't see it going anywhere. At the moment, all it contains is content which has been taken almost directly from Death has a Shadow, and I don't really see how the creator intends to expand on this. The individual episode articles should be more than adequate to cover this. Tx17777 20:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as nonsense. So tagged. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please don't abuse the speedy criteria. G1 is only for patent nonsense, that is, content that is unintelligible. This article clearly doesn't meet that criterion. Powers ^T 20:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per my comment above. Powers ^T 20:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is just a cut'n'paste or similar fork from a section of the Death Has a Shadow episode page. Not really sure it belongs anywhere, but it's at least on-topic and doesn't require specific notability there. I can imagine a viable (citedly notable) article about syndication cuts or last-minute broadcast changes, but we'd need some pretty specific refs to make the idea specifically notable with respect to a certain season of a certain program. DMacks 21:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Powers and Mack pretty much say why I think it should be deleted. TJ Spyke 22:10, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. A stretch at best to be its own article outside the proliferation of famly guy articles that already exist. Keeper | 76 00:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.