The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Theosophy. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chain, Planetary

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable terminology apparently invented by Blavatsky. If it is of any value it can be a simple mention on Blavatsky's lengthy biographical page rather than its own article. It is not necessary to turn every fanciful concept, model or theory from Blavatsky's books into articles unless there are significant third party sources that make them notable. In this case they do not. Ash (talk) 22:48, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect to Theosophy. Article asserts that it is relevant to this, so it seems like the most logical place to put it. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 23:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Theosophy. The article refers to a concept that Helen Blavatsky called a "planetary chain", with the theory that there are seven Earths, the one we live on and six others in six other dimensional planes, or something like that. Until someone can explain it a little better, no need to spin out into a separate page. Appropriately, after a merger and redirect, this article will continue to exist in something similar to another dimension, one that can be accessed by crossing over into the history of the redirect term. Mandsford (talk) 15:46, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to pile on, but Merge and Redirect to Theosophy seems logical to me. There does not seem to be independent notability for this sub-topic, as opposed to, say, chakras. Bearian (talk) 17:28, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.