The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 18:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chamanlal Kamani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

person is not really worthy of a story on this wiki. A Internet search returns little - connected take down chat - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Deepak_Kamani Mosfetfaser (talk) 18:58, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A (fairly important ?) businessman in Kenya ? I say keep - Africa gets short shrift on Wikipedia (and google ..) Wizzy…☎ 09:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I sympathize with you but "getting short shrift" is not a wikia guideline to promote stories - On the Africa wikia you will probably find much more,. however on the English wikia there is after searching, almost no notability here - Mosfetfaser (talk) 19:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker^talk 00:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'On the Africa wikia' - there is such a thing ? We (myself South Africa) and Kenya mainly use the en wikipedia. There is a swahili wikipedia, but the language of business and government in Kenya is English. To return to topic, it could be construed as an attack page, but the subject is notable. Wizzy…☎ 07:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe they meant the Afrikaans Wikipedia, but why that would cover Kenyans more than other wikipedias, I am not sure. Other possible languages that might have wikipedias, like Akan, would also not apply here. I am not sure about the merit of the article, but do have to say that we must remember the goal of wikipedia is not to right great wrongs.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:17, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They were probably referring to Wikia, a completely different project from Wikipedia that has no affiliation with the Wikimedia Foundation. The website allows users to build user-created wikis about anything, including Africa. Mz7 (talk) 18:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.