The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus, tending to merge. bainer (talk) 13:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Trudeau[edit]

no evidence of individual notability except as father of son. Wikipedia is not genealogy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porturology (talk • contribs)

• Delete, no real assertion of notability. Royboycrashfan 01:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Appears to have been minimally notable entrepeneur seen as having played role of some significance to amusement park enthusiasts, who deserve no less respect that Pokemon devotees and porn collectors. Monicasdude 01:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nomination. --Rockpocket 01:30, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. dbtfz^talk 02:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. My unverified personal opinion re Monicasdude's remark above is that the significance is minimal. Martinp 03:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Pierre Trudeau and info abouthis early years.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:16, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. per nom. ॐ Metta Bubble ^puff 06:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to PET's article -- Samir T C 08:04, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Pirre Trudeau. --Terence Ong 08:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Pierre Trudeau. Info is notable enough for that article. Unfortunately, the subject is not notable enough for a separate article. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 09:01, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per several above. Just zis Guy you know? 12:16, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per above --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 12:55, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge just following the crowd. -- Alpha269 15:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per B1nguyen. Fagstein 17:40, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as per all of the above. Jude(talk,contribs) 01:14, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. He was an important entrepreneur in Montreal in his day, but the article needs more. Luigizanasi 06:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Sufficiently notable. Peter Grey 07:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: there are many separate articles for historical figures about whom we don't know anything besides their name and who they were related to. Peter Grey 07:10, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Point some out. I'll nominate them for deletion as well. Fagstein 18:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • How about Augustine Washington and Mary Ball Washington. Peter Grey 18:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • Those can be expanded. I've added an external link to Mary Ball. Feel free to point out others on my talk page. We shouldn't keep non-notable people just because other non-notable people are out there too. Fagstein 18:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • Of course they can be expanded. Almost every article can be expanded. But their notability is the same as Charles Trudeau. Peter Grey 19:00, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
          • How many museums are named after Charles Trudeau? Fagstein 21:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with son’s article, as above. Not sufficiently notable to warrant an independent article. —GrantNeufeld 03:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Monicasdude Jcuk 22:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Monicasdude. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 12:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Monicasdude, and enhance. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 01:49, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.