The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G7. The only reason for closing this as a speedy delete is because the author has requested deletion and there's no significant content. Should anyone want to use this as a starting point to create a new article then I'll be more than happy to restore/draft it (could also be requested at WP:REFUND as this is more of a courtesy deletion per author request) —SpacemanSpiff 16:58, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chengal (Place)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Jerry266444 (talk) 11:14, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to Chengal, Kerala. Geographic places are widely regarded as notable.- Mr X 12:37, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The applicable guideline is WP:GEOLAND.- Mr X 20:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the nominator is also the article creator, who created it at 7:09 with the edit summary "(NOTHING BUT CREATED SOMETHING)," then nominated it for deletion, with no reason, five minutes later. This doesn't seem to be anyone we can rely on to improve. Unless there is someone willing to clean this up, then I think this should be regarded as a case of WP:TNT, and an article creator requesting deletion. Delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:59, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move per MrX. Stubify if necessary. The place exists,[1] there are a couple of schools,[2][3] and GEOLAND applies. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and restart instead as geography places are notable but there's nothing currently acceptable so unless someone is going to come and improve it, it's better restarted anew. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.