The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 22:14, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chengmai Center[edit]

Chengmai Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOFEAT. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:06, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:06, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I tried searching the Chinese version of the name but couldn't find anything to pass GEOFEAT or GNG Spiderone 10:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete without prejudice of recreation - a skyscraper of over 1,000 feet will likely pass WP:GNG at some point, but all I see is skyscraper blogs at this point. SportingFlyer T·C 18:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per SportingFlyer above. Nothing on the page is worth drafting/merging.   // Timothy :: talk  20:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.