- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Chepakovich valuation model[edit]
- Chepakovich valuation model (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:N, or have a suitable WP:ATD, as a merge/redirect to Alexander Chepakovich would perhaps unbalance that article. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 16:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable and highly-likely to be self-promotion given the editing history and the reference spam that I just removed from Alexander Chepakovich. Doesn't appear in any reliable texts about valuation. Jfire (talk) 19:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.