The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chirognomy[edit]

Chirognomy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Google shows that compared with chiromancy, this term is very little used. The article has only one unreliable) source. The subject itself is, of course, abject nonsense, but in this case it does not look to me to be notable nonsense. Guy (Help!) 22:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - It's fairly notable nonsense, but the article is just an exact copy of one paragraph in the Chiromancy article. It doesn't add any other info or sources. Delete (or redirect back to Chiromancy).    SIS  23:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete & Redirect to parent Chiromancy. Verbal chat 19:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.