The result was merge into Dancing with the Stars. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This page hasn't enough information. It is referenced, the song is just a promotional single and there's no music video for it. It should be deleted or redirected to patent album's page.Voices4ever (talk) 13:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Xclamation point 03:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. The lead sentence of the article is also its deletion rationale: Notebook Hockey is a newly invented table game. See WP:SCRABBLE. Delete. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 23:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g1, complete bollocks, yet another "word we made up that means whatever we want it to mean", WP:NFT, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Neologism with no assertion of notability except for local usage. No sources. Delete. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 23:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Xclamation point 03:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No sources to show that the album is real, Google Search for the album brings up 0 results. Edgehead5150 23:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:13, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Created as an advertisement by User:Schieldenver, company has no products released yet. (WP:FUTURE) JRP (talk) 23:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Xclamation point 03:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am requesting deletion because I feel this guy isn't notable enough. A quick search for reliable sources turned up nothing for me except for an orthopedic surgeon of the same name. Tavix (talk) 23:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Google shows that compared with chiromancy, this term is very little used. The article has only one unreliable) source. The subject itself is, of course, abject nonsense, but in this case it does not look to me to be notable nonsense. Guy (Help!) 22:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdraw per reviews found. NAC. Schuym1 (talk) 20:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find any reliable sources for this.Schuym1 (talk) 22:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. Malinaccier (talk) 05:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 21:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to The Adventures of Little Carp. MBisanz talk 04:22, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 21:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. No list of characters to merge to; series not notable enough to create list. Malinaccier (talk) 05:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 21:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Jem characters. MBisanz talk 04:22, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 21:31, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Xclamation point 03:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
EP, unsourced since one year, fails WP:MUSIC, and is probably completely false information (particularly in light of her new album).
Prod declined by an anon user. AmaltheaTalk 21:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to The Adventures of Little Carp. MBisanz talk 04:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 21:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Xclamation point 03:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 21:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. Malinaccier (talk) 05:12, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 21:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability Canis Lupus 21:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:25, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article completely fails NPOV and Verifiability. The concept of men refusing marriage as a political protest might be notable, but that would be better represented as a section in Arguments against marriage. The few useful parts of the article have been merged to a section there. The article is nothing but arguments why men should not marry, and the arguments are not attributed to anyone. The references are about declining marriage rates and provide support for some of the arguments, but do not describe the topic of the article ("Marriage Strike") at all. Rather, it is an original synthesis to form an argument. I suggest redirecting to Arguments against marriage and deleting the current redirect Male attitudes toward marriage. I did redirect Marriage Strike myself, but it was reverted several times. There is some discussion on the talk page. Apoc2400 (talk) 21:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is a NEW "marriage strike" page,the article was completely rewritten, with excellent citation etc, neutral point of view, overcoming all the objections listed above. The new marriage strike article offers discussion of current topics regarding the present day sociology of marriage avoidance. Arguments against marriage article is more historical and political in nature.The newly written Marriage Strike page should NOT BE DELETED.Daxmac (talk) 21:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)daxmac[reply]
It has been less than 12 hours since I lasted posted in the discussion/talk page on the article and its already been deleted? How come no one is interested in actually discussing these things or getting a third party opinion or mediation or any of the other normal paths taken to resolve disputes? hmmm... Jwri7474 (talk) 21:48, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have posted again on the talk page. Hopefully we can come to a compromise here. Thanks. Jwri7474 (talk) 21:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please recognize that the opinions of SiobhanHansa are highly biased. SiobhanHansa has a long history of activism against articles she is personally at odds with. SiobhanHansa is colluding with Apoc2400 to attack this page on personal grounds. As SiobhanHansa has said on the Marriage Strike talk page - she essentially didn't like the fact that rates of marriage have fallen due to men's choice in the matter. SiobhanHansa did not like this information. The mask 'slipped'.
SiobhanHansa could not find other another plausible explanation to explain away the fall in marriage rates. See her sandbox - she tried hard. So, in attempting to delete information about the Marriage Strike, she has decided to hide information from herself and others that does not fit her world view. Strong, long-term bias from SiobhanHansa. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DesertTruffle (talk • contribs) 08:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've listed your Tag_team_editors collusion work below so that the record is clear for others. DesertTruffle (talk) 13:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This morning while you were redirecting I was having a go at a rewrite. Rather than revert your redirection I pasted my edits into a sandbox. It's in no sense a good or finished article but provides a little more depth to the term than the current Arguments against marriage paragraph. I would appreciate your thoughts on whether it would be a good alternative to redirecting the article. A significant part of me favors the redirect because I think it will be easier to ensure less POV pushing long term. But I spent a few hours putting the rewrite together so have a certain attachment to seeing that information in the encyclopedia if appropriate. -- SiobhanHansa 11:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
|
I actually went and checked all the articles on Google news ([2]), 101 hits in total.
Remaining are 24 columns or opinions pieces. Removing duplicates there are 13 distinct ones: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. All by eight opinion writers. None of it is actual news coverage.
Our guideline on reliable sources says
--Apoc2400 (talk) 16:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Since this article was deleted... I would vote to at least expand the current section "men's movement" in the article Arguments against marriage. Thanks Jwri7474 (talk) 09:08, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Articles fail the verifiability test. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is a band which allegedly had two top ten albums, yet Google has never heard of them. I agree with User:Guest9999 who tagged it as a likely hoax.
I'm also nominating their alleged albums
Iain99Balderdash and piffle 21:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as failing WP:N and WP:V. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article has a number of problems, not the least of which is that there is little in the way of reliable sources to indicate that the subject does in fact hold a world record. I went through a Google search - News, Blogs and Web - to try and come up with solid reliable sources to back up the claim, and wasn't terribly successful. There are a lot of Google hits for Mr. Varma himself, but many of them seem to be variants on this article posted to locations that accept submissions. The two registries that are stated to have declared the successful world record also turn up few Google hits, and I have to wonder about their authority in terms of being an authoritative source for the base claim here. We can lump in the fact that the article has been edited by Jayenvarma (talk · contribs), Musicrecords (talk · contribs) and Worldrecordbassplayer (talk · contribs), and there's some conflict of interest involved as well. I think this needs some discussion as to whether it's an acceptable article. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Reply
I had earlier confessed that I was ingnorant of editing rules and that was the reason for making many changes and blanking it out of frustration. Sorry for the same. I ofcourse was dealing it like a blog. But I realise now that WP is such a very reliable and reputed Organisation. I appreciate your comments. And surely, like any other human beings, I am doing it to be noticed and everyone does it as self promo. I am to break my own record end of this month in front of 20000 people in India which will be varified by computer software then and there( this is yet to be confirmed by the organisers after discussion with GWR or RHR). . If anyone can play faster than what I did he can ofcourse break it and I told many people and organisations that I am ready to do demo infront of any great musicians to prove what I did, provided the notes per second should be varified by computer Thanks for all the informations. Regards JV
Thanks With due respect to the WP editors, I thank for the above comment, which is really objective. I hence request the WP editors that the page may be made as if it doesnt look like self promo. Now, I would appreciate even if the page heading 'Jayen Varma' is changed to meet the WP policy. Regards JV —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayenvarma (talk • contribs) 16:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestion for getting edited After going through the Rules and Criteria for notability,very carefully, I am convinced that the article requires changes. Now I feel I am not competent to edit it. Therefore I wish to submit the article to the WP Editors to scrutinise it to meet the criteria. Hope this can be accepted after editing by WP editors. Regards, JV
Registry of Official World Records (UK&USA) and Record Holders Republic (UK) in 2008 declared a world record in bass guitar for Fastest Percussive Bass Playing [16]. . The Record is 36 percussive notes per second, played by Jayen Varma from India. Percussive Bass, which is otherwise called slap bass is conventionally played by slapping the strings with Thump and Poping the strings with index and middle fingers. But the precussive bass style adapted by this Indian Bassist is in the same way that the Indian percussion instruments tabla and mridangam are played. Percussive Bass is played mainly in Funk Music, though it is widely used in many music now a days. Percussive bass style has been going through many major changes since it’s evolution in 1920’s and many Bass players play this using different techniques. More information in this can be had from the List of slap bass players (electric bass).
Reference
http://www.recordholdersrepublic.co.uk/recordholdersdetails.asp?id=484
External Link
1. http://www.myspace.com/jayenvarma
The Recent Editing suggestion above I went through the notices in my page once again and could see the following notes:- .1)Delete: It is basicly a self promo page which makes a neutral POV nearly impossible 2)This article or section is an autobiography, or has been extensively edited by the subject, and may not conform to Wikipedia's NPOV policy. But when I looked in to this link: List of slap bass players (electric bass) For Eg; Pl see the profile of the 25th person in the said list. I do not want to name him. I could see that many of such in different profiles look like self promo and autobiographies or biographies of different bass players. Anyway I respect many of the Bassists in the list. Kindly look in to those with a neutral and indiscriminatory view. I however love many of those Bass players and respect them.
However, I have made changes in the above submission to get edited with a view that mine should not look like an autobiography or biography as per the WP policy. I have produced proof for what is written there. I have also received appreciation from many Bass players including the greatestJeff Berlin. In this context, I request to either approve my above suggestion for editing or kindly delete my page at the earliest since it is filled with many notices and that is indirectly affecting my profession. With due respect to all the WP Official Editors. JV —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayenvarma (talk • contribs) 07:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Editing Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page. Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed.'
Based on the aforeread notice in the article's page, editings has been made. I have done it to the best of my knowledge after due discussion with others who are familier in this. Please see if the editing is appropriate. If not it is requested that the article may be approved after making necessary changes as per the WP rules. And if it is not found to be notable, it may be deleted, since it is a long discussed article where there is no false information and proper reference is given. I am doing the editing since the notices are still there in the article's page even now.
Thanks for the informations..
JV —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.237.129.163 (talk) 18:12, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks I request that a decision in this may be taken as early as possible since its a long discussed matter. Regards--Jayenvarma (talk) 01:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Google and google news searches prove notability. Malinaccier (talk) 05:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article was prod'ed but was removed by a new user. The article has no reliable sources and fails notability. Bidgee (talk) 20:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed PROD. No evidence of notability provided over and above any other business person. The "references" do not actually refer to Mr. Barnett at all. PROD disputed by a new editor, Erroreraser (talk · contribs), as his/her third edit. His/her first edit was this charming message Mattinbgn\talk 20:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC) Note: PROD was disputed with the following edit comment: "Notability is not being notable in Cleveland"[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not seem to be notable. A quick google search brought no results worth mentioning and she doesn't have much of a claim to notability anyway. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 20:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 04:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Has been speedied once as non-notable group. Almost certainly written by someone with a COI. Short on references. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(talk) 19:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
&Keep. Coverage considerable. Ten news & features in newspapers (US) are quoted, as well as one from Ghana and one from Uganda, two magazine features, 3 school & similar sources, not counting references to ECM's own website or others, databases and handbooks.Musoniki (talk) 18:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. Malinaccier (talk) 05:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, non-charting song. Fails WP:MUSIC#Songs. Redirect reverted without comment. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 19:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 02:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, non-charting song. Fails WP:MUSIC#Songs. Redirect reverted without comment. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 19:52, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable club, raising a little money for charity. No Secondary sources. Fails WP:ORG. TrulyBlue (talk) 19:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to ¡Viva La Cobra!. MBisanz talk 04:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, non-charting single. Fails WP:MUSIC#Songs. Redirect reverted without comment. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 19:48, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. Malinaccier (talk) 05:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, non-charting single. Fails WP:MUSIC#Songs. Redirect reverted without comment. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 19:40, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a1, no substantive content after copyvio removal. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources found to verify notability. Also, I suspect WP:COI. Prod declined. — X S G 19:31, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Maxim(talk) 22:00, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Essay-like rambling about the Tekken game series. Tried to prod it, got second vote then author removed my prod. Rob Banzai (talk) 18:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
STAY because tekken is full of theories and not facts so it should stay. Ace2690 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ace2690 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
STAY because it could be a good page, base on everybodies ways of tekken i think its a good page STAY because all the facts base on tekken stories is and are theories because most of the so called facts about the story are not stated in the game. so they are theories. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unknown2020 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
STAY because they right about it all look if you guy want to know why it should stay ask one of namco producers here is her email devil_jin_kazama@juno.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Power250 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
stay because tekken series is good and the page is just looking at the series in a defferent way, i think its cool. --nicrow-- —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:56, 30 September 2008.
Stay The reason why I made this page is so that many fans could come and talk about the tekken game and comics series. many of us has talk to one of the tekken comic producer, and she has told us that many of tekken stories is mix up, the producer says that namco has defferent stories about tekken, and many people have question and theories. So I came up with tekken theories because namco have the game series defferent from the comics series, so i wanted to tell the defference between them, and tell the theories about them from the tekken forum fan web page base on tekken. I still want to work on the language and corrections on the page so that I can make it out of an artical. These are just theories not facts about tekken, these are forum tekken fans theories base on the comics and games series of tekken ––Teriko–– —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:42, 30 September 2008.
STAY because these theories is good to think about, because the series is alittle mix up. --carvus-- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.240.42 (talk) 21:03, 30 September 2008
Stay because its just explaining the tekken theories, from the facts. --darkryuken-- — darkryuken (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Stay because its good a little theories about some, life has theories —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrinkyaku (talk • contribs) 21:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC) — [[User:(({1))}|(({1))}]] ([[User talk:(({1))}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/(({1))}|contribs]]) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Stay its pretty cool to wounder about the unknown about tekken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.240.42 (talk • contribs) 30 September 2008, 21:42 (UTC) — [[User:(({1))}|(({1))}]] ([[User talk:(({1))}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/(({1))}|contribs]]) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was Delete, and redirected to Paris Hilton#As a recording artist. Cenarium Talk 14:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:CRYSTAL. Album has no name yet. No sources other then an on air interview. Hammer's Law applies. GtstrickyTalk or C 18:26, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep (non-administrative closure). The article does show notability, but it is mentioned that there are WP:COI problems with the article. COI itself in an article isn't necessarily a reason to delete an article, and that's the main problem here. There's a ((COI)) tag on the article, so someone should eventually cleanup the COI in the article. Besides the COI problem, there's no reason to delete this from looking at the discussion below. -- RyRy (talk) 16:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant advertisement, posted by an employee of the company (as admitted on the talk page). Article does nothing but promote the company. References verifying various "facts" about famous clients and such are not present. (Contested speedy; a virtually identical version of this article was speedy-deleted previously.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Skeyelab (talk) 18:29, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Google news search shows notability. Malinaccier (talk) 05:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Changed to delete. Google news items are passing mentions and consensus is against me. Malinaccier (talk) 01:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article on unremarkable film director, with COI issue. Two of his films have articles but are themselves of somewhat iffy notability (although they feature notable performers). Unreferenced except for movie reviews and none of those meet WP:RS. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Notability established. Malinaccier (talk) 05:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:MUSIC. See also Theo and the Skyscrapers (2006) and So Many Ways To Die, their albums. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:29, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aside from lacking sources to demonstrate notability of this term, there's also no evidence to suggest it's not a neologism. Further, this seems like this could be original research filled with weasel words. --Craw-daddy | T | 17:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete, and redirected to Paris Hilton#As a recording artist. Cenarium Talk 14:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Single fails WP:MUSIC. Radio only release, uncharted, from an album that is still a piece of WP:CRYSTAL. Creator restored article after a redirect, so here we are at AFD. Kww (talk) 17:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC) (categories)[reply]
why can "If I Were a Boy" and "Single Ladies" have articles and not this one?? CHECKORUP (talk) 11:40, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete all NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:40, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable album from a non notable band. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 16:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Get Your Red Wings Retching Red & The Twats splitṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 17:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Halo (series). MBisanz talk 04:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Basically WP:CRYSTAL. Sources verify little else than that the game exists. If this were an album it'd be WP:HAMMER. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:31, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Police officer of no apparent notability other than featuring in an incident which doesn't even have a Wikipedia article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 22:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. No consensus to delete. Malinaccier (talk) 05:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
References do not support notability requirements. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:31, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
COI article. I'd have speedied it but technically it asserts notability (youtube comments and ratings, please). It is clear from reading it that the series has not received any coverage in reliable, independent sources. Drat (Talk) 14:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Snowy Delete as obvious hoax. Eluchil404 (talk) 20:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article says he co-directed three major films, but there is no mention of this in the Internet Movie Database for those films. e.g. [37]. In fact Philip Geng is not listed anywhere in the IMDb [38]. A Google search [39] finds 27 hits, none to do with the film industry. Jll (talk) 17:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
One-shot special cruft celebrating 10 years of the sketch show existing that was made when the program was at a creative wane and months from cancellation. All sources are either PR fluff or TV/movie directory descriptions of this glorified extended episode, and this is certainly not on the level of any regular reunion special (which rarely have separate articles) or a network anniversary program. Note that the article creator currently has two other nominations, one from me, for articles which deal with minor Nickelodeon topics inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Nate • (chatter) 09:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Fay Moulton. MBisanz talk 14:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable football coach, no biographical information proffered. A previous AfD was withdrawn on an editor's assertion that the college football Wikiproject had declared all college coaches notable and that Moulton was an Olympic athlete. However, WP:CFB's notability essay goes well past the remit of WP:ATHLETE, the subject fails WP:V completely in that there are no independent sources, and the Olympian is in fact Fay R. Moulton RGTraynor 20:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request As discussed on the AfD talk page, if this article (or any of the series of articles) is closed as a delete, please kindly first move the article to User:Paulmcdonald/Articlename, where "Articlename" is the name of the article (or articles) being removed. Also, please note the new page location at User:Paulmcdonald/deletedcoach so we can be sure to find the moved page.
Why? There have been, at present count, 58 articles of our project placed on the AfD list and there is just not enough time to adequately and appropriately respond and ultimately improve the articles themselves. This would give the project memebers time to work on improving the articles. This request should in no way imply that I believe that the article (or articles) in quesiton should be deleted at this time. I am making a simple cut-n-paste request due to the sheer volume of AfDs in such a short period of time.--Paul McDonald (talk) 00:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not convinced that this costume and set designer is notable. She appears to have been nominated for (but did not win) one of the Green Room Awards. Grahame (talk) 12:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Football club which plays in the Southern Amateur Football League, which is "a mixture of 'old boys' associations from schools and colleges, business house sports clubs as well as private clubs". The league is not part of the football pyramid and has never played in any FA competition. Bearing this in mind, I do not believe the club is notable. пﮟოьεԻ 57 12:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not pass either WP:BIO or WP:PROF. A plain google search gives 6 hits[41], nothing at all in GoogleScholar and GoogleBooks. The two books authored by the subject are not listed in WorldCat as being held in any libraries[42]. No evidence of citability of his research that I could find, no academic awards or honors and no other coverage by independent sources to show passing either WP:PROF or WP:BIO that I could find either. Nsk92 (talk) 11:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Boldly redirected, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
another article exists for The Mind Eraser which discusses the roller coaster. Capt. Beardo McDougal Esq. (talk) 10:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 04:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
non notable college tv presenter that lacks non trivial coverage in reliable sources Duffbeerforme (talk) 10:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious violation of WP:NOT#INFO, and likely WP:N, no evidence that broadcasting the Triple-A All-Star Game (which isn't extremely notable itself and I believe that article should be merged to AAA (baseball) with the game details removed) makes any of those reporters notable, nor is a notable subject itself, not worth a merge to Triple A All-Star game neither because of notabilty concerns Delete Secret account 15:29, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Triple-A All-Star Game. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 23:26, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete (G10). -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Vandalism ɷ i m b u s a n i a 09:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
this is not vandilism. the guy i am writing aboput is sitting next to me helping come up witht he rubbish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirachinmoku (talk • contribs) 09:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 16:07, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:MUSIC on all counts. -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 09:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as failing notability due to lack of reliable sources needed for verifiability. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:24, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Article presents no assertion of notability (WP:N) or independent references (WP:V). Prod with these concerns was removed anonymously without comment in July. Request for sources since then has unearthed [43], a blog which isn't sufficient per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Are weblogs reliable sources? (blog author has 22 ghits) Marasmusine (talk) 09:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge and redirect to My Chemical Romance. This issue should have been discussed on the talk pages of the articles as this really isn't the place for a merge/redirect discussion. While this can be the result of a deletion discussion, initiating a deletion discussion with the intent of discussing a merger and redirect is inappropriate. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Three musicians that are part of a notable band, but have no individual notability as per WP:MUSIC. Redirect at each page is persistently contested and redirected. Using AfD to get consensus and formal approval for the redirects. Nouse4aname (talk) 08:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Other musicians:
Adding former drummer, has no other notability claims other than previous having played with the band.
The result was speedily deleted by Alexf. Non-admin closure. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 10:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax, probable attack page. Google finds only a myspace page for this individual. TrulyBlue (talk) 08:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as failing WP:N due to lack of reliable sources which can be used to verify independent notability. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 04:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 17:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as failing verifiability due to lack of reliable sources which can be used to verify all of these competitions the article subject is alleged to have done well in. While it's great that so many people"know" he has done well in so many different competitions, Wikipedia requires sources backing up these claims. So far, no one has provided them, instead just stating that they "know" he has won (or done really well or played something really difficult). This closure is not prejudicial, and the article may be created again in the future IF reliable sources can be found supporting all of the claims made here. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No really reliable sources, mostly YouTube and trivial mentions. Seems to fail WP:MUSIC. (I just hate it, too, when people put an article in a category, sub-category, and sub-sub-category.) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:42, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
TheOrchard is the biggest music distributor online, but also an Indy label, and works with both independent and mainstream label artists. The individual sites have to accept the artist into their library, the more sites the artist is accepted to, the more important the artist is to the TheOrchard catalogue and the Digital Label. The Chopin Competition is one of the most respected American piano competitions: here are a few links about it: http://www.thekf.org/MUChopin.html, included Carnegie Hall: http://www.carnegiehall.org/article/box_office/events/evt_13211.html?selecteddate=04052009, http://www.musicianguide.com/biographies/1608003145/Murray-Perahia.html. The other contests mentioned on the page now include the Kingsville, which is one of the biggest international competitions in the US for all instruments for the the under 24 age category (I believe Bennett won prizes in it in 1995 and 1996). The Richardson is a national competition held in Lansing, MI annually that rotates through instruments. The Silver Lake is a now defunct International Piano competition that was held in Silver Lake, WI. 71.178.122.46 (talk) 20:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC) It should be noted the page for Frederic Chiu, Elizabeth Borowsky, and Moses Hogan all cite the Chopin Competition in their wikipedia articles as notable accomplishments. Ruslan Sviridov mentions the Kingsville competition in his entry. All have less page views per month than Bennett. 71.178.122.46 (talk) 20:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
and he is a child prodigy, apparently. says who? self proclaimed, nothing more. 58.165.60.208 (talk) 14:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC) It's not personal 58.165.60.208 (talk) 14:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep due to addition of references indicating notability. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 08:02, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable conference; borderline advertising. Blowdart | talk 10:23, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete leaning toward keep. Please take the merge discussion to the appropriate article talk page(s). ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 08:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article was created by User:Roman888, a serial copyright violator, possibly as a vehicle for his continued transgressions. Its existence outside from the 2008 baby milk scandal, which is itself (45k) hardly at a size where it is of concern, is potentially a POV fork, so I do not see a justification for retaining this article at this present time. Please note that the creator is on the bench for his repeated copyright violations. Ohconfucius (talk) 10:19, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 06:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Was legitimately prodded by another author. Prod removed by main editor however article still appears (as per the previous prod) to be a non notable car - with no sources & indeed the one link provided is a Chinese link which does not assist this article. --VS talk 07:52, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
-->
The result was delete. Lack of sourcing is fatal here. Stifle (talk) 15:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced, non-notable product.
The result was delete as unsourced WP:BLP, and redirect to phpBB. No sources are provided to support any biographical facts beyond a role in software development. The opinions acording to which this role or his being interviewed (about the software, not about himself) confer notability are given less weight because they are at variance with WP:BIO. Sandstein 07:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
One possibly reliable source and that's it? Contains quite a bit WP:OR (he currently lives in Canada? where does it say that?), and is, overall, a giant WP:BLP1E violation Misterdiscreet (talk) 16:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as failing WP:N. Additionally, the sources provided either 1) don't say anything about the event in question, 2) are blogs which are not generally considered reliable sources, or 3) are primary sources which can not be used to establish notability. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rather spammy write up of a non-notable new event. The author could not even be bothered to check whether WIkipedia's idea of an handcar is the same as theirs! - Sgroupace (talk) 07:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A grammar correction service written up by user:Gramlee. Is it spam or not? - Sgroupace (talk) 07:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Cirt (talk) 06:46, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability, page provides no secondary sources other than the company's own site to establish it as a "major pharmaceutical company". MrNerdHair (talk) 07:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
--Other sources have now been provided including its "major" presence in the country. Buttons 06:31, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 06:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability... Page references no secondary sources to establish this is a "major" pharmaceutical company. MrNerdHair (talk) 07:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
-- Added additional source concerning the article Buttons 05:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A few assertions of notability but no evidence offered. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability. It provides no secondary sources referencing the organization other than the organization's own website. MrNerdHair (talk) 07:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable software; the PROD was deleted, so i've moved it here. Ironholds 07:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC) Ironholds 07:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Pyramid scheme. Cirt (talk) 06:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Obvious SPAM. Article's references criticize this pyramid scheme for the sole purpose of promoting a second one. Repeat occurrence, strongly recommend salt, or protect as redirect to Pyramid scheme Reswobslc (talk) 07:21, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Sandstein 07:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect this page does not contain sufficient material to assert the importance of its subject. However, I don't know enough in this area to tag it for speedy deletion, and thus require consensus to verify my suspicion. MrNerdHair (talk) 06:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
--Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BIO, aspiring actress with extra parts and Youtube videos. Prod removed by anon. Jfire (talk) 05:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep as meeting WP:N. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
May or may not be notable - sent to AFD. Rschen7754 (T C) 21:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
not enough secondary sources to write an article and subject is not notable Jeremiah (talk) 21:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this article for deletion because it is nothing but plain cruft. It also provides no real-world notability and only appeals to a small group of people - those who watch the show. --haha169 (talk) 04:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Related discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The S.S. Tipton
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are assertions of notability but doesn't seem notable enough. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Failed PROD. Unsourced article about a non-notable actress. DCEdwards1966 04:33, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedily Deleted (non-admin close) Beeblebrox (talk) 20:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No sources or google hits. Suspected hoax. Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedily Deleted (non-admin close) Beeblebrox (talk) 20:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of notability. Was tagged for A7 speedy deletion and the tag was removed without comment. I do not wish to edit war over a speedy tag. Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Cirt (talk) 06:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This was tagged for speedy deletion as WP:CSD#A7. It has a slim assertion of notability, and the press has been written up. I don't think this is an A7 but I don't think it meets notability standards either. Chick Bowen 04:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Basically just an episode of "Arthur". No reason for it to exist as a separate article from List of Arthur episodes. JuJube (talk) 04:11, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also added because it has basically the same issues:
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Non-notable person. Author of two self-published books which are not notable, and has been a production coordinator for a handful of TV episodes. No independent sources to verify biographical details. Very few Google hits. Article was originally written by Brabaw's PR agent, definite COI issues. Same author wrote a similar article about Brabaw two years ago which was speedied. This edition was speedy-tagged but declined, then PRODded which was removed without explanation. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Trivial intersection. I see nothing particularly notable about acts that have had two or more self-titled albums. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:32, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Cirt (talk) 06:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article was speedy deleted twice, but is back again. Obvious problems with WP:RS. All of the films listed here are redlinked and (I assume) none were ever released outside of Indonesia. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment well it depends.(1) Once again another Indonesian topic is left out of the Indonesian project deletion list (2) problem is that many Indonesian editors have no idea of RS and at most times the request to ask them to add them is left with complete and utter silence from the editors (3) I dont think that Indonesian editors have sufficient or adequate understanding of article V - N issues to adequately defend afds for a start - which makes the speedy suggestion so tempting I suppose (4) although perhaps not meeting conventional understanding of the N or V context the external links onto youtube would be ok if this wasnt an afd :) SatuSuro 10:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:58, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to fail WP:WEB and/or WP:CORP. <100 Google hits, for one. Biruitorul
Talk 03:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable strip mall. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 03:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
not notable, info could be merged into other articles Saveourcity (talk) 02:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hopelessly PoV article, while sourced, many of the sources doesn't tell why many of these games are "notable" and the few that does aren't really independent of the subject (team websites). Some of these notable x games as been deleted in AFD before, and I see this one no different Delete Secret account 12:16, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Notebook Paper. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No rankings or awards or anything else that would lead one to believe that reliable source material is available for this topic. Fails Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Songs. -- Suntag ☼ 05:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete, default to keep. Sandstein 07:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is an album article with little more than a track listing. In sufficient source material. Fails Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Albums. -- Suntag ☼ 05:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Suicide Silence. Cirt (talk) 06:31, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources found to verify notability. Prod declined. — X S G 01:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 06:31, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources found to verify notability. Existing sources are press releases and a blog (not reliable). Does not meet guidelines for general notability. Claim for notability for a band (Peak #94 on Billboard 200) is questionable. Prod declined. — X S G 01:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete, default to keep. Sandstein 07:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Essentially spam. This Christian community did get a little bit of local media coverage but certainly not enough to support the current content of the article or, in my opinion, a full article which can be properly sourced. Oh and if you like the notability guides: WP:ORG. Pichpich (talk) 01:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Vince11881 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vince11881 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]Notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice." It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." Please consider notable and demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education. Large organizations are likely to have more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability; however, smaller organizations can be notable, just as individuals can be notable, and arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations.
Please Consider. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.139.35.158 (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]Guidelines:Local churches, parishes, and congregations should usually be considered to be notable if they meet one or more of the following criteria, as documented by references cited in the article:1. The congregation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the church itself. 4. The congregation plays a notable or significant role within its denomination or religion. This only should apply if the denomination is notable in itself. It also should be documented by sources external to the individual church, but possibly internal to the denomination. 10. The congregation's teachings or theology is considered unique or notably controversial. The teachings should be of the individual church, not its denomination. 11. The congregation building has particular architectural and/or historic significance."
The result was Delete Gazimoff 00:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is devoid of meaningful content. It's just a list of geographical names. It was created in February 2005 but never developed. There are already many other articles on aspects of European music, so notability is not really relevant here. The problem of the article was discussed on the Music project here. Kleinzach 01:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. Stifle (talk) 14:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of this article is not notable, as it has not received any third-party coverage. While I agree that many of the games themselves are notable, that does not make the concept of iPod games notable. There are two sources: the Apple website itself and a website which is not a reliable source. Therefore, the article is both non-notable and unverified. seresin ( ¡? ) 01:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The movie appears to have not been released and that it's status isn't known even though IMDB has the release date as March, 2008. The reason that I think that is because the only reliable source that I could find is the official site. I searched on Google, Google News, Rotten Tomatoes, and Movie Review Query Engine.Schuym1 (talk) 00:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's messy, ad written, and it doesn't assert notability, nor seems that it is. If this is a total screw up on my part then let me now. It's been so long. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 02:01, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete per G10- Attack page. Shana tova!-- L'Aquatique[talk] 01:26, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article is about a non-notable neologism. Prod was removed by someone. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 00:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Gazimoff 23:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article has a lot of information, but seems to be purely an advertisement. — Yavoh 02:18, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 04:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an unsourced, cluttered trivial list. It's nothing more than an advertisement list of shows that helped promote new seasons of shows. RobJ1981 (talk) 04:37, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not show significant cultural, social and economic impact on the local and regional market area. No support in third party credible and reliable secondary sources. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Gazimoff 23:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Articles whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:MUSIC) and it is uncited and appears to be wriiten by the subject, i.e. being a Vanity page. 125.236.160.92 (talk · contribs) Text copied from article's talk page. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ is repressed but remarkably dressed 13:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Gazimoff 23:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be a purely local company without anything more widespread. DJ Clayworth (talk) 13:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A user added a CSD. It doesn't meet that criteria, but I'm not letting the article off the hook just yet. LAAFansign review 22:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete. A single mention, and that's a press release in google news. Comment by User:VasileGaburici. Sorry, my bad google fu, so keep. VG ☎ 12:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure I understand the problem with the wikipedia SevOne page. It offers a neutral viewpoint and gives a reader a basic understanding of what SevOne is. I have read the Wikipedia: Deletion policy (Reasons for deletion) and do not see a reason for the SevOne page to be killed off. Other pages that are very similar to the SevOne page that are not in danger of deletion are: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netqos http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bentley_Systems http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WSFS_Bank
I can not see a difference between these pages and the SevOne page. Please let me know what actions I need to take to insure that the SevOne page remains on Wikipedia.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwmetz (talk • contribs) 13:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable rapper with only 1 album on a major indie label; fails WP:MUSIC. Prod removed without comment. Unreferenced—also fails WP:V.—Hello, Control Hello, Tony 13:16, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
None of the awards cited are notable ones. The only source is a PR piece, and I can't find any other reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:07, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Subject is a non-notable model and the article is unreferenced. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 21:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article appears to be about a subject that does not meet the notability criteria. Prod removed by creator, who repeatedly accused me of persecuting him for nominating the article for deletion. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:00, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]