Note: All messages left in this talk page will be replied in this page. This is to prevent fragmentation of discussions, for the purpose of future references. Thanks.
It was created because the rapidKL website was so hideous and was hard to read. Nowadays, its better but still not user friendly. I always keep in mind that one day someone will question the existence of these bus routes, and it may not be appropriate accordng to Wikipedia's many policies. However, I insist that we have it, and maybe making it a lil more simpler, that is, having the table, but less "Via" destinations. I found that those destinations have increased significantly over the recent days.
If the conditions warrant the route table to be removed, then do it. As long as there is an external link to the bus schedule from rapidKL website. --Zack2007 13:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Good Job with all the additions and motifications on the transportation pages in Malaysia. Without you, it will be left stagnant and stubbed. I am pretty busy nowadays so if I have the hands, I will help you and others. Thank you so much k. You deserve a tap on the back. :D --07:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zack2007 (talk • contribs)
![]() |
The Barnstar of National Merit | |
For all your work with Malaysia-related articles, I, Sharkface217, hereby award you this barnstar. --Sharkface217 03:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC) |
Hi. I notice that, on September 9, you created a substantial number of cross-namespace redirects to "Education in X" categories. I initially encountered only one such redirect and was planning on nominating it for deletion (at WP:RFD), but decided to discuss the issue with you directly after noticing just how many redirects were involved (about 50). There are two reasons I think such redirects should be deleted.
Firstly, cross-namespace redirects are generally discouraged and frequently deleted (see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Precedents). Secondly, and more importantly, the existence of these redirects discourages article creation. Take, for instance, the template at the bottom of Education in Africa#External links. A redlink is essentially an invitation to create an article, whereas people have to click a bluelink in order to realise that it's a redirect. This is especially true of links to articles on lists of topics by country. These lists are used by many for article development (i.e. to see what articles still need to be created) and a bluelink that is merely a redirect to a category gives the illusion that an article actually exists, thereby decreasing the likelihood that someone will see the need for and try to create the article.
So, I just wanted your thoughts on the matter. Thanks, Black Falcon (Talk) 00:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Working under the idea that perception is important, however, I can see where you are going with your explanation. I was planning to finish off with remaining continents, but with consensus ruling against this sort of redirects (one of reasonings is to be friendly towards mirror), there are solid grounds for me to stop and have existing redirects deleted. You may list all of them for deletion whenever you see fit. Thanks again for bringing this up. - Two hundred percent 02:58, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
It's spelled similar in every country that uses English. Look the word up. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 01:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. Based on the majority votes, we have selected Malaysia to be our first Collaboration of the month for October 2007. Please feel free to contribute and make suggestions to improve the article. And can you add your name to the list of project members so its easier to locate all participants. Thanks! kawaputratorque 05:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, your user page came up on a google search for "malaysia copyright", so I am hoping you can help me. I am looking for whether works of the Malay government are public domain. Specifically, s:Lee Hsien Loong's speech, National Day Rally 2005 (Malay) is a presumably a work of the government (English translation), and the terms of use on that site dont indicate that it is PD. John Vandenberg (talk) 05:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
I, Acs4b, hereby award you the Working Man's barnstar for all your diligence and hard work by improving Wikipedia's poor coverage on Malaysia-related articles. Congratulations! Keep up the good work and please don't stop contributing to Wikipedia! Acs4b T C U 11:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC) |
Hi there
I'm just back from a holiday in your fine country, and I've got a few photographs to share (pd-self). I've uploaded a few (check my contribs at commons), but I'm not sure how to name the others.
Would you like me to email them to you? You can upload them and find a way to fit them into articles, categories, etc. You can manipulate them anyway you like, as long as the images remain public domain. Looking forward to your reply, cheers. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 11:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the delay, totally overlooked your message. I wish my country was peachy though. :C - Two hundred percent (talk) 15:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
For starters, images of a marina at Penang, and a few others:
--Rifleman 82 (talk) 15:36, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
The first four shots are of the recently completed Tanjung City Marina off Weld Quay, Georgetown, including the historic Church Street (Ghaut) Pier (linked directly to shore).[1] It's apparent the end of the Church Street Pier facing the sea was either demolished in place of new structures or augmented into the additions.
The fifth shot is presumably remnants of the Tan Jetty, Lee Jetty, or both, southwest from Chew Jetty and Lim Jetty.[2] Both jetties were apparently demolished for some coastal development, perhaps involving land reclamation. There was a local newspaper report on their demolition and the uncertain fate of the remaining jetties a year back.
Based on these assessments, the present names are fine by me. It's the descriptions that require expansion.
Visually, the first two and the last two shots are fine, although the first shot is somewhat awkward with a single pillar in the foreground partially blocking the view of the marina. There are no severe tilting, which can't be said with the third shot (Will work on that later. It's a bit late now). The last four are perfect for cropping from the top and bottom to trim out the sea and sky, good as panoramic versions of the original (which can be retained alongside the panoramic versions).
Will look into these further the coming night. - Two hundred percent (talk) 18:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, based on the total votes collected in December, our collaboration of the month will be ♦ Mahathir bin Mohamad ♦. Please feel free to make improvements on the article, or comment or give ideas on ways to further improve the quality of the article. Thanks. kawaputratorque 18:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I think I've fixed it. There was a cut-and-paste move that got deleted after the original article got converted to a redirect and moved to a third location... sheesh. The talk page may be lost forever though, as it was forked off in many directions. east.718 at 14:00, January 3, 2008
Hi there. I just want to announce that this month's collaboration will be ΦЏ Orang Asli ЏΦ. You are encouraged to participate in improving the quality of this article by however means you wish. I would suggest that our target by the end of the month would be for this article to achieve a Good Article status. Happy editing! kawaputratorque 13:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
To: User:Kawaputra, User:Two hundred percent, User:Edmundwoods
Hello, I would like to ask you for help. We are having problems determining whether Malaysia recognised Kosovo as independent state. Here is a statement from Malay Ministry of foreign affairs and I would like to ask you to clarify to us if this is formal recognition, or something other from that. Please answer [[3]]. Thanks in advance, 92.37.123.179 (talk) 00:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
You placed a tag on Campro engine stating that there was suspected copyright violation. Would you please clarify which part of the article you suspect? I randomly tried several sections of text and they didn't match any text in the article you linked to. Thanks. Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
--BorgQueen (talk) 02:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I accidentally keyed "enter" in this latest edit before finishing my edit summary[4]. I was meaning to say that "The purported "Malay name" is not any more historical than "Pedra Branca". Pedra Branca is used in Malay in Singapore, and should be the only Malay name to appear in the article. Alternative names used by foreign countries are about as relevant as inserting a German name for Hainan Island in the Hainan Island article.--Huaiwei (talk) 10:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
--BorgQueen (talk) 10:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
--BorgQueen (talk) 01:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
WRT your edit to the 2008 baby milk scandal#Malaysia section, it seems that our readings of the source are not the same... what is your take? My interpretation is that it is one and the same company (and not a namesake), but S'pore sources the plastic-bottled milk from China, whilst Malaysia manufacturers all DL branded products in its own Malaysian factory without dairy sourced from China. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Dutch Lady Malaysia managing director Hans Laarakker said no Dutch Lady Malaysia products had raw materials sourced from China.
“Milk products sold in Malaysia are manufactured in our factories in Petaling Jaya, or imported fully-packed from countries like the Netherlands and New Zealand,” said Laarakker.
Dutch Lady Malaysia manufactures and distributes milk products ranging from infant formula, growing up milk powder, UHT (ultra high temperature), sterilised and pasteurised milk as well as yoghurt products.
As for the withdrawal of Dutch Lady’s strawberry-flavoured milk in Singapore, Laarakker said it was an isolated case where the milk, packed in plastic bottles, was tested and found to contain melamine.
He added the particular strawberry-flavoured milk in plastic bottle was the only product from China.
Laarakker, however, reassured the public that strawberry flavoured milk packed in boxes were safe to drink.
Dutch Lady Milk Industries Berhad's managing director Hans Laarakker said within Dutch Lady Malaysia, there are no Dutch Lady products or dairy raw materials sourced from China.
Dutch Lady Malaysia manufactures and distributes milk products ranging from infant formula, growing up milk powder, UHT (ultra high temperature) milk, sterilised milk, pasteurised milk to yoghurt products.
Laarakker stressed that the company’s milk powder was mainly sourced from the Netherlands, Australia and New Zealand.
“Whatever is being distributed within Malaysia is manufactured within our factories in Petaling Jaya itself or mainly imported fully-packed from countries like the Netherlands and New Zealand.
“On this score, my message to all Malaysians is a strong assurance that Dutch Lady Malaysia’s products are safe and fit to consume,” he said Tuesday at a press conference here.
Laarakker also urged consumers to start reading labels on every food item for self-assurance and to check where the products originated from.
About the withdrawal of Dutch Lady’s strawberry flavoured milk in Singapore, Laarakker said it was an isolated case, where the strawberry flavoured sterillised milk in plastic bottle was tested and found to contain melamine, as it was produced in China.
He explained that the particular flavoured milk packed in plastic bottle was the only product from China and sold in Singapore for the past 20 years without a problem.
He however reassured that strawberry flavoured milk in boxes were safe to drink and 95% of Dutch Lady products in Singapore came from Malaysia.
“As a precaution, all sterilised products from this factory in China have since been withdrawn from the Singapore market.
“For similar reasons, all sterilised milk in plastic bottles from the same factory in China has also been withdrawn from the Hong Kong market even though their testing did not reveal any contamination,” he said.
Laarakker also said he was aware of all the e-mail and short message service (SMS) circulating among the public about contaminated milk, including Dutch Lady brand of sterilised milk, and he believed the messages started from Singapore.
He urged consumers to visit www.dutchlady.com.my or call 1-800-88-1191 for further clarification.
Hi,
I'd noticed that some of the templates I've customized for subdivisions of Malaysia/states of Malaysia have been TfD-ed by the people here in Wiki. Would like to thank you for taking up the time to engage in discussion with them. I'm sorry have been very busy with work and some personal issues to contribute much to the malaysian wiki efforts. BTW I'd be happy to provide any help if possible just drop a message on my page and I'll see what I can do.
--Bukhrin (talk) 16:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
I'm here to specially thank you for these 2 pics from Commons:
...Because I'm working on this school. In fact, I only came to your pics off Google lol. I wonder if you have anymore related images? That'd be very much appreciated. And oohhh yes, 99.999% Malaysian articles are badly written. — Yurei-eggtart 11:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
I've taken the liberty of moving your draft from User:Two hundred percent/Dirtbox/Federated Malay States Railways to Federated Malay States Railways — it's infinitely better than having no article at all! Jpatokal (talk) 06:24, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
After all that high and mighty statement about how other Malaysian contributors do a bad job at maintaining and expanding Malaysia-related articles, I'm guessing you're joining them now judging by your list of shrinking contributions? Welcome. __earth (Talk) 04:04, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Two hundred percent! An article you have contributed to may need your expertise. It has been tagged for a very long time as being in need of attention to avoid possible deletion of unsourced sections according to Wikipedia policies. If you have a moment, please see talk:Malaysian English and address these issues if you can help in any way. Kudpung (talk) 04:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Employees Provident Fund of Malaysia logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
((bots|deny=DASHBot))
to your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:22, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Employees Provident Fund of Malaysia logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Muar State Railway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 11:18, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
User:Two hundred percent, I'm not quite sure what is going on with Muar State Railway. You have over 7k edits, so obviously know how to form a proper reference, yet the article doesn't have any proper references. There are some urls in a reference section, but the first is empty, the second and third are blocked by my provider, so while they may be OK, that's a red flag. The last looks like a personal blog. Can you fill me in on what is happening?--SPhilbrickT 13:54, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Employees Provident Fund of Malaysia logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
I am a Singaporean and I agree with you that articles about Malaysia are that snobby than those about Singapore. But please do not call us autistic. It is probably more focus is given to Singapore than Malaysia.
And please note, stop spamming articles about cars (Hyundai Sonata, Toyota Corolla, Honda Stream etc.) with pictures. There is simply too much. Elroygoh (talk) 03:50, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Datok Keramat. Since you had some involvement with the Datok Keramat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 08:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Two hundred percent. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Internet companies of Malaysia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:15, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Central Bank of Malaysia logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Malaysian Barnstar of National Merit | |
Thank you for your contributions to articles within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia | ||
This WikiAward was given to Two hundred percent by Chongkian (talk) on 15:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC) |
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Category:Association football people by prefecture in Japan. Qwerfjkltalk 16:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § X by Y in Z on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 11:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Two hundred percent. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United Malays National Organisation Youth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Category:History of Malaysia by Federal Territory has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)