The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BIO and probable WP:COI (authors username resembles who the article is about and the article is also that users user page). Matt(Talk) 06:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vain vanity in vain. Delete user page also as a mirror. JuJube (talk) 08:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, with possible reference to WP:SNOW, as pure vanity promotion. AlexTiefling (talk) 09:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have left a message on the author's talk page. Let's see what she does. Oh and weak delete as COI. Maybe if she is notable enough, someone will create an article about her from a neutral point of viewNarutolovehinata5tccsdnew 12:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I don't want to support WP:SNOW in this one instance in case some better sources can be found, but I feel its unlikely. RFerreira (talk) 18:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Was there any attempt to speedy this?--CyberGhostface (talk) 23:26, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.