The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCari02:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Microbeads are certainly of interest. There's still also some novelty to this construction (smaller beads, harder beads, elastic covering) compared to older beanbags. As I don't know of any uses for these beads outside these pillows, and as a key change from traditional beanbags is also their use of a Spandex-like outer covering material, then I'd favour keeping it here rather than renaming to Microbeads. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:52, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But microbeads aren't the same as the beads (expanded polystyrene, bigger, softer) used in the big beanbags since the '60s. These new ones are different. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:20, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article itself (wisely) makes no claim of notability. Despite being in existence for four months, the article cites not even one reference. Bongomatic (talk) 06:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 08:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.