The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. Stifle (talk) 14:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IPod games[edit]

IPod games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The subject of this article is not notable, as it has not received any third-party coverage. While I agree that many of the games themselves are notable, that does not make the concept of iPod games notable. There are two sources: the Apple website itself and a website which is not a reliable source. Therefore, the article is both non-notable and unverified. seresin ( ¡? )  01:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Review here at MacWorld which I believe is sufficiently independent of Apple for our purposes. It's a review of games as a group, not individually, which seems to validate the article concept. MadScot (talk) 02:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Well-written, sourced, and notable, I think the opposite is reverse: while not every game is notable, the concept of an iPod game is notable. Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 03:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep at worst, there's no problem with "List of games for X platform"-type articles, though sourcing would help a bit more. This article attempts to add more, so that's even better. --MASEM 13:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — additional sources from Engadget and in Popular Mechanics — more than enough to satisfy the hunger of WP:GNG. MuZemike (talk) 20:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per MuZemike. --63.3.1.2 (talk) 22:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Snow keep. Subject is notable and article simply needs regular editing. It would be nice to start including sources so readers can have confidence in what is written. -- Banjeboi 23:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Snowball keep: individual games on the list are notable, as well as the larger concept of games on the iPod. LOTS of reliable third-party coverage out there, and certainly enough in the article currently to meet our standards. Randomran (talk) 00:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.