The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily Deleted (non-admin close) Beeblebrox (talk) 20:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mikie Marsh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No evidence of notability. Was tagged for A7 speedy deletion and the tag was removed without comment. I do not wish to edit war over a speedy tag. Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - part of Hoax. See nom for USA Grape Catching Competition. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 06:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete hoaxalicious. JuJube (talk) 08:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete again Even if true, this is decidedly non notable. There is no verifiable information from reliable third party sources. The only source for this is the Youtube page. A search of the Internet does not reveal significant media coverage. Nor does a search of Google news. No book mentions. Not enshrined in scholarly works. No real assertion of notability, if you look at it. Which is why I speedily deleted it before. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 14:59, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete with extreme prejudice as unadulterated bullshit Beeblebrox (talk) 04:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.