The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Delete By listing the model's endorsements does make an assertion of notability IMO. However since the article is unsourced I lean towards deleting this article. RadManCF (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I cross-linked to the Korean language wikipedia, which has less info. Edit history shows that all of the content was created by one editor who only created that one page.
Delete No reliable sources --Rirunmot 01:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.