The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher King (options trader)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded with the following rationale: "This page is not finalized as more information from more third party sources are being compiled, due to copyrights In due time it will definitely become a substantial article with cogent information for research and knowledge.) " However, no improvements over the past week. Appears to be promotional piece, very poorly sourced. At best it might be moved to userspace of the article's creator in order for potential development. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete almost all the sources are from the company King created. Clear lack of passing the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet either WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG criteria. No other secondary sources available on search. Appears promotional. --Jack Frost (talk) 14:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.