The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Marquess of Headfort. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Taylour, 7th Marquess of Headfort[edit]

Christopher Taylour, 7th Marquess of Headfort (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Irish peer, fails WP:BASIC due to a lack of secondary, independent, reliable sources covering the subject in depth. Earned the title of marquess in 2005 and therefore cannot qualify for WP:NPOL due to the House of Lords Act 1999, which deprived them of a seat in the House of Lords.

Source assessment follows:

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
"- Person Page 8114". www.thepeerage.com. Retrieved 9 February 2016. No Deprecated self-published peerage website. No
"Headfort, Marquess of (I, 1800)". www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk. Heraldic Media Limited. Retrieved 1 May 2020. No Deprecated self-published peerage website. No
"The Marquis of Headfort". The Telegraph. 8 December 2005. Retrieved 1 May 2020. No Passing mention (one sentence, the article is an obituary of the subject's deceased father) No
"Sir Thomas Michael Ronald Christopher Taylour, 7th Marquess of Headfort", * 1959 No WP:SPS No
Michael Parsons, "The Irish couple who scandalised London society", the Irish Times, 14 January 2012. Accessed 3 October 2022. No Passing mention ("Peerage records show that the incumbent is Thomas Michael Ronald Christopher Taylour, 7th Marquess of Headfort (born 1959) and the heir apparent is his son, Thomas Rupert Charles Christopher Taylour, Earl of Bective (born 1989).") No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using ((source assess table)).

Pilaz (talk) 20:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.