The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. But a redirect is viable — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher du Pont Roosevelt[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mindbogglingly non-notable lawyer with a famous ancestor; see WP:NOTINHERITED. Orange Mike | Talk 23:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A famous father and a seat on some commission which will never have an article here doesn't cut it for notability. Mangoe (talk) 23:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 03:50, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination. --Iconoclast.Horizon (talk) 03:57, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - per nom, clearcase. ukexpat (talk) 03:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my standards for attorneys. Bearian (talk) 15:17, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Tgeairn (talk) 15:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Roosevelt family, where he is mentioned. Redirects are cheap (indeed, I seem to recall reading that a redirect takes up less server space than a deletion does!) and it avoids leaving a recreation-bait redlink. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Roosevelt family per Bushranger. Zappa O Mati 21:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.