The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:15, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ciara Taylor

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. The organisation where she is political director may be notable, but the sources added to the article (after I prodded it) are again not about her, but about the organisation, where she is giving comments as a kind of spokesperson for the organisation. There has been no significant independent attention for her as a person, only for the organisation she is part of. Fram (talk) 06:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject fails WP:GNG simplest standards for notability. Cllgbksr (talk) 16:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sign that the article passes GNG with significant sources. Also the article lacks an encyclopedia tone.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.