The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --PeaceNT (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cindy Pucci[edit]

Cindy Pucci (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article does not demonstrate sufficient notability for inclusion and is not verifiable by quality sources. Specifically the article fails the test of WP:PORNBIO as Pucci has not been a serious contender for a significant award, made a unique contribution, or established herself in mainstream media. TheMindsEye (talk) 03:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:45, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - According to AVN, she's appeared several times in mainstream media. Whether that's "featured" enough for WP:PORNBIO, that's good enough for me. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete not notable, fails WP:PORNBIO, no reliable sources, fails to win or be nominated for any major awards, and is not established in mainstream media. Annette46 (talk) 04:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • A little pointy, perhaps? Given your stance at this AfD. Epbr123 (talk) 08:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Maybe Cindy needs more movies and a hairier pussy? Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Has had a small amount of reliable, independant coverage. Epbr123 (talk) 08:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep She has an entry on Internet Movie Database. She has her own adult title coming out later. A fairly long career as a glamour model and now moving into adult entertainment. That is noteworthy and news worthy. 71.163.8.65 (talk) 00:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Notability is not lost if someone changes professions. This nomination shows the flaws in the whole concept of even having WP:PORNBIO. Five regular movies so notability seems to be there. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.