The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:03, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases (WoS is not a database, but an access platform, the journal is in WoS because it is included in the not-very-selective Emerging Sources Citation Index, which also contains some predatory journals). No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 09:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A search for the portuguese name only returns hits about their creators. Regards, Comte0 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.