The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (G11) by Jimfbleak. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Circular 360 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced promotional Rathfelder (talk) 12:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. st170e^talk 16:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. st170e^talk 16:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete kind of WP:PROMO and def unsourced, also upcoming so even if it is popular, WP:TOOSOON Sheepythemouse (talk) 16:23, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and I tagged as such, nothing at all for any applicable notability, promotional is noticeable and nothing else to suggest fixing. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.