The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. There are some deletion nominations that I just can't understand. This is obviously a major area of study,[1][2] and we all, as people who are trying to build an encyclopedia rather than knock down others attempts to do so, should be welcoming editors who create articles to fill such glaring holes in our coverage rather than calling for deletion of such articles. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn the subject has potential but this article still needs some attention. Still little more than a dictionary defnition.--RadioFan (talk) 03:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.