The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn with no delete votes present. Nonadmin close. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 12:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Claude Genest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Subject is non-notable candidate in an election, which is not intrinsically notable as per WP:POLITICIAN. References to Al Gore and his father do not establish notability, as per WP:NOTINHERITED. I don't see enough about his academic career to satisfy WP:PROF either. justinfr (talk) 12:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Georgina Wilcock is also being considered for deletion. On that discussion, some have argued that Genest's article is a reason to keep both. Rather, I believe they should both be deleted. Personally, I like the greens. I hope they win so that I can see many, many articles about their Members of Parliament. justinfr (talk) 12:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I think my brain might be fried today. Somehow I missed that Emmy nominated line, which is probably enough for notability as a movie producer. Sigh. Big apologies, and I withdraw the nomination. justinfr (talk) 12:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.