The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Despite the distressing weakness of a number of the keep !votes (indeed, of the five, only two actually make valid arguments), it's obvious that notability is established enough that a snowball has a better chance in Hades than of this being deleted. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:10, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Claude Stokes (intelligence officer)[edit]

Claude Stokes (intelligence officer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SOLDIER. ...William 22:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Claude Stokes (diplomat), as diplomatic career was even more significant than his militaryt careerLeutha (talk) 22:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions....William 22:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The nomination fails WP:VAGUEWAVE and denying the antecedent. Warden (talk) 08:03, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. British High Commissioner in Trans-caucasia is a notable post. He was also awarded the CIE, which is a notable honour (it has generally been held that anyone with a CBE or higher is notable enough for an article). However, it should be renamed Claude Stokes, since he's the only one here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:28, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:54, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Necrothesp mainly for his work as a military attache and diplomat. MilborneOne (talk) 18:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep articles on this establishment figure and similar should be encouraged. Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:01, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow keep. OBEs are practically all notable. Pburka (talk) 00:05, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, OBEs aren't, but higher awards generally are. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:42, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Please note that articles under discussion in AfDs shouldn't really be moved until the AfD is completed. This article has now been moved twice during the AfD. This is why I said it should be moved but didn't move it myself. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:42, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.