The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 15:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clifford Francis Price[edit]

Clifford Francis Price (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, almost nothing on Google, promotional in tone and sourced only to "our family history records" Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notable enough for me - my vote is to keep the page and remove the proposal to delete. You don't have to be on google to be notable, especially when you were an international athlete from 100 years ago. Even athletes without an international pedigree seem to get a Wiki page nowadays - does the fact this happened 100 years ago make it less notable ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.14.233.160 (talk) 15:55, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's no supporting evidence for anything, including that claim he was an "international" athlete. Since this is your first post you might want to check the Wikipedia guidelines for notability at WP:N. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.