The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia. czar ⨹ 06:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clifford Peel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This World War I pilot didn't live long enough to become notable. He has an entry in the Encyclopedia of Australian Science, but that's just as short as this article. Could be redirected to Royal Flying Doctor Service. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:34, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia I searched, but could find very little.ShulMaven (talk) 02:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect: I found quite a few mentions with this search [1], including this [2] which provides some more biographical information. Mainly the hits seem to be in relation to the inspiration he provided for esablishing the RFDSA, though, and probably don't consistute signficant coverage. As such, a redirect to RFDSA probably makes the most sense (it seems a viable search term at least). If significant coverage can be established, though, I would have no dramas with the article being recreated. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 20:17, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect: per AustralianRupert, makes sense. Anotherclown (talk) 05:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.