The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:02, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clipper music[edit]

Clipper music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor band that had minor attention. I declined a speedy on this article because the interviews and such are a claim of significance to me. The article was highly promotional, but I cut a lot of that out. Feel free to review the article history, you won't find anything of importance. v/r - TP 20:54, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails GNG, barely traceable on Google, looks as if finding any decent refs will be v.diff. Shame. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:22, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per WP:BAND. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.