The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cloudism[edit]

Cloudism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

non-notable religion עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I don't think religions come more nn than this. Movingboxes (talk) 13:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vandalism because its a hoax unless someone can prove otherwise, i highly doubt the creator is going to prove his case because he knows it doesn't belong on the pedia Monster Under Your Bed ^(talk) 13:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as WP:MADEUP. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 13:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Google search of "Cloudism" brings up no hits related to a religion except for Wikipedia and mirror sites. The article is a hoax. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I wouldn't go so far as to call this a hoax, because after reading it, I am sure that 2 students WP:MADEUP at school, just as the article states they did. Turlo Lomon (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I know what you mean. It was made up and the article was created to have some harmless fun at Wikipedia's expense. The reason, though, that I use the word hoax is due to the claim of it being the fastest growing religion in the world. No big deal either way. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Either way it's made-up nonsense. Speedy delete. --Explodicle (T/C) 16:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • The only speedy criteria under which it may qualify is WP:CSD#G3. Feel free to tag it as such. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • This article is obviously worthless. This is the guy who wrote it. Why waste any time on this? --Explodicle (T/C) 17:38, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
          • So tag it. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • It probably is the fastest-growing - no adherents yesterday and two today! JohnCD (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - a classic example of something made up in school one day. JohnCD (talk) 18:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As per above. Sadly, it failed speedy... Lady Galaxy 19:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It failed because it was tagged as WP:CSD#A7 under which it does not qualify. The only possible speedy criterion might be WP:CSD#G3. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete religioncruft JuJube (talk) 01:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Is it snowing? Blackmetalbaz (talk) 08:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Hey, I go to MHS, and yeah, it was made up by two kids. They think it's a real religion. Delete freely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.183.103.228 (talk) 08:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy - I would allow ((nn-group)) as a valid criterion! — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.