The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 06:40, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not convinced of notability, and the current article is a whole can of unusually wordy adspam. Opabinia regalis 01:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, passes the Google test as a current notable London venue. Should be rewritten per List of London's gentlemen's clubs (where it is not listed). --Dhartung | Talk 07:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Copyvio removed, stubified. --Dhartung | Talk 07:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete - Doesn't seem notable enough to warrant a rewrite, even if there's not much to rewrite. --Draicone ^(talk) 09:00, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — Passes google test, but needs a rewrite, Martinp23 12:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Dhartung. Baseball,Baby! ^{balls•strikes} 19:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Dhartung. Note: now listed in List of London's gentlemen's clubs. --Daniel Olsen 00:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The place may be more notable than we think. <KF> 01:54, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.