The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  08:41, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Code Aster[edit]

Code Aster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:PRODUCT or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 13:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable software tagged since August 2008. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• I found this: http://www.cad-magazine.com/content/codeaster-20-ans-d%C3%A9j%C3%A0 which looks like a good source Siuenti (talk) 18:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't Delete It is a respected code base and one of the extremely few open source FEA packages. It is used in engineering research as well ^{[1] [2]} Gregory Holst (talk) 00:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.