The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cold-weather biking[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating this article for deletion for a number of reasons. In no particular order:

It's been lacking additional citations/references since 2007.
Most of the page is unreferenced and therefore appear to be Original Research and appears to be the original thought/opinion of the author.
It's not quite written in a How-To/Advice style it appears very close.
It doesn't cover any specific variation, type or facet of the cycling, it could be generally summed up as Cyclists may ride in the cold, they may put on extra layers, because it's cold, they may use wider-tyres because it's cold.

In General I don't feel it adds anything to Wikipedia as an article. Rehnn83 ^Talk 09:03, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - A11. This is just not a thing. —Мандичка^YO 😜 09:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a guide book. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:51, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.