The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:08, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Collectiv3[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. I can't find any evidence of WP:notability perhaps WP:TOOSOON. I'd also like to mention that the group was formed 3 months ago. The sources provided and some of the ones I found through WP:BEFORE lack editorial oversight. Although I found this but not enough for the group to merit a stand-alone article here. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Perhaps not fully notable yet. SwisterTwister talk 22:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Keep as Does have Enough References. I Would Recommend another External link.CalabJessika (talk) 09:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are unreliable. Please see WP:RS for what is considered reliable sources. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 07:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to be notable.The Cross Bearer (talk) 19:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How is this a policy-based argument? What makes you think that this utterly non-notable group is notable? Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 07:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikicology and SwisterTwister: I will explain. The sources used in this article, Jaguda, Pulse.ng, OkayAfrica, are reliable sources used to confer notability upon this BAND, per notability guidelines. Pulse.ng is a website maintained by a bunch of editors, per topic area. I researched the sources to showcase this bands notability.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jaguda.com is not in anyway a reliable source. It has no editorial control. See about us. The Chief Editor, Arinze Obikili is a non-notable blogger. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a place where every group described in common website get freebie articles.Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 11:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikicology: I guess we will have to just agree to disagree on the subject at hand.The Cross Bearer (talk) 01:34, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I hope this can be relisted a 3rd time for better attention. SwisterTwister talk 07:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will get some more attention on this by pinging some uninvolved editors to this discussion. @3family6, Ilovechristianmusic, Metalworker14, White Arabian Filly, and Walter Görlitz:

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.