The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 12:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is a joint nomination for the organization and the same-titled album.
The organization and the album both fail GNG, which requires significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The only material coverage I was able to identify for either the album or the organization was in Christian sources. Note that there is tons of notable Christian music that—that is, Christian music that gets significant coverage in reliable sources that are not dedicated to Christian topics (Billboard has at least four Christian charts), so I am not in any way suggesting that Christian music is in any way inherently non-notable).
The organization also fails WP:ORG, which for non-commercial organizations requires both:
(1) is not met by funding international charities. (2) is not met by having a few write-ups in very closely-linked sources. Since both are required, the organization doesn't meet the guideline.
I do not believe that WP:MUSIC is applicable to the organization as the article is about a charitable organization. Were it to be applicable, these are how the criteria would be applied. The only possible hope is (6), and I don't believe it is reasonable to come to a positive conclusion on that one, either.
The album may be considered by reference to WP:NALBUMS, which points back to the the basic criteria of N (i.e., WP:GNG) as the only way to establish notability for an album. The album, as mentioned above, fails GNG. Bongomatic 03:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]