The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 04:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Computer Science Conference Rankings

[edit]

Tagged incorrectly as speedy delete for original research, tag removed and now seeking consensus on this being deleted as pure WP:OR. The Rambling Man 07:40, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Interesting, usually original research is just part of an article, whereas here, there is no article, just original research. It also appears to be self-referential. 71.190.2.99 07:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Almost speedy delete. I'm the one that tagged it for speedy, but alas, WP:OR isn't a speedy criterion. Maybe it should be when is as blatant and pervasive as it is in this case. The whole blinkin' thing is nothing but original research. Well-meaning, but confusing as heck. Realkyhick 08:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. Not only is it original research, it conceals the methodology (despite appearances to the contrary) by citing nothing. Wikipedia is not a rankings service, although who knows, it might be a revenue stream to explore. --Dhartung | Talk 09:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per reasons given above Q ^{T C} 00:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, POV fork of List of computer science conferences. John Vandenberg 02:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.