The result was merge to List of Spooks characters. Keeper | 76 14:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No sources, only reference is the BBC's website, basically it looks like something that could go for A7 if this was a real person. MIVP - (Can I Help?) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 13:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Any significant character in notable fiction should get a one or two paragraph description. Any non-trivial character in a notable work should at least have a single line description in a list, and a redirect to it. (It doesn't matter how many characters there are--the more complicated the story, the more need to explain it fully and properly). We're here to provide encyclopedic information--and if the main work is worth covering in the first place, people are likely to want some degree of detail. Why else would you use an encyclopedia in the first place, if you didn't want detailed coverage? And, there is no valid reason why there should not at least be a redirect, so deletion is inappropriate. Anything anyone might rationally want to look up should have a redirect if there's relevant content in Wikipedia. DGG ( talk ) 00:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 00:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]