The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:40, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contactizer[edit]

Contactizer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non-notable software product. I have been unable to find significant coverage, with the weak exception of [1]. The article has been largely written by a SPA representative of the company, and an earlier prod was contested by single-edit IP. Haakon (talk) 20:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Macworld, Macworld, Network World has coverage. This review of a competing product is measuring it up against Contactizer which is indicative of a major product in a market space. -- Whpq (talk) 16:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.