The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 02:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cool Handshakes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is less an article and more an essay. Also pure original research. Night Ranger (talk) 05:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No notability whatsoever: WP:N and purely unencyclopedic material.
• Delete. While it is an interesting idea for a research paper, the article is purely original research and is not encyclopedically written. There's no reliable sources to back up any of the claims in the article and anything that would be considered encyclopedic is already covered at secret handshake and handshake.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
• Delete per Tokyogirl79. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 11:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:OR, Bazj (talk) 11:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As people have said above, it's purely original research. PatrickAnimi (talk) 14:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.